Laboratory hazards

Module 4.1 - Learning objectives

  • Understand the difference between hazard and risk
  • Be familiar with the hazard classes for wet laboratories
  • Be introduced to common hazards in wet laboratories
  • Be introduced to hazard controls for wet laboratories

Module 4.2 - Hazard categories

There are hazards in every aspect of life. A hazard is defined as the inherent property of a substance, process or activity that predisposes it to the potential for causing harm to health, safety or human welfare – a potential source of harm to a worker. Some hazards are more evident than others, and laboratories can be full of hazardous materials. Hazards are grouped into five (5) hazard categories:

  • Chemical – Conditions that can lead to contamination by harmful or potentially harmful substances. Examples include toxic gases, noxious fumes, and corrosive liquids or powders.
  • Biological – Conditions where living organisms can pose a threat to human health. Examples include syringes carrying potentially infected blood, specimen containers with potentially infected materials, and viruses spread by HVAC systems.
  • Physical – Conditions in which objects, materials or structures can cause material or bodily harm. Examples include objects or substances that are flammable, explosive or noisy or conduct electricity (shock), and hazardous environments involving extreme hot or cold, radiation, slippery surfaces or low ceilings.
  • Biomechanical – Conditions that cause biomechanical (body and movement) stress on workers. Examples include workbench height, chair design and workstation set-up.
  • Psychosocial – Conditions that can affect the thoughts, behaviour and mental well-being of workers. Examples include stress from using equipment without proper training or instruction or from being coerced into using defective tools or materials, and burnout or depression from constant exposure to high-stress situations.

Laboratories have the potential to contain any, a combination of, or all of these hazard categories. The United States Chemical Safety Board produced a video entitled “Experimenting with Danger” that chronicles three laboratory incidents at UCLA, Dartmouth College and Texas Tech University, including the deaths of members of their communities. The video is shown at pertinent parts of this online workshop and is intended to provide a glimpse into these incidents, and inspire leaders to reflect on their own laboratory practices and ensure the health and safety of everyone in their lab.

Module 4.3 - Specific hazards

Laboratories present a wide variety of specific hazards. The following items provide a general overview of practices related to often-encountered hazards within laboratories.

Laboratory Safety - Module 4.3 - Test Your Knowledge

Module 4.4 - Hazard control

Control actions follow a hierarchy, with the elimination of the hazard to the extent possible being the most preferred option. If the hazard does not exist, it cannot cause harm. Where the removal of the hazard is not possible, substitution of the hazard with a less-hazardous alternative is the next best option. Engineering controls, or controls implemented at the source of the hazard, are the next most desired action – and typically the next most effective – as they usually do not require further intervention by the end user(s); the control exists indefinitely. Administrative controls are those put in place regarding how the work is conducted or modified to reduce the extent of the hazard or exposure to it. If none of the above hazard control options can be implemented, personal protective equipment (PPE) is a reasonable hazard control option.

It is not uncommon for hazard control measures to overlap to ensure that workers are adequately protected (e.g., fume hood sash combined with protective eyewear or face shields).

Controlling hazards within a lab allows users to safely use the material that they require. 

Control hierarchy for lab safety

Using a smoke machine, the video shows how fume hoods are intended to contain the operations within their cabinet. A sash positioned too high will not maintain suitable face velocity, which will allow vapours to escape the containment of the cabinet and expose persons working nearby.