Source use in academic writing: Challenges for students and assessors
Apr 16, 2019 — 12:30 p.m. to 2 p.m.
The Canadian Centre for Studies and Research on Bilingualism and Language Planning (CCERBAL) warmly invites you to its next research forum about The Source use in academic writing: Challenges for students and assessors presented by Heike Neumann, PhD in Second Language Education with a focus on second language assessment.
Abstract:
Integrating information from outside sources is a key requirement for academic writing in many disciplines, and for this reason we have seen a rise in the use of integrated writing tasks, which require test takers to refer to at least one written or aural outside source in the production of their own texts. Such test tasks require students to understand the source text, analyze the assigned writing topic, select appropriate information from the source text, and organize source ideas and their own opinions into a cohesive text. These task requirements pose significant challenges for second language (L2) writers, and previous research has shown that L2 writers are more likely than first language (L1) writers to use source information inappropriately by not citing sources or relying too much on the language of the source text. In this talk, I will share findings from a research project designed to explore the specific challenges students faced in an EAP program in order to develop specific pedagogical materials to help address those challenges. In Phase 1 of the project, we collected students’ source-based essay exams and analyzed the following aspects in these essays: (1) language used to refer to source information, (2) accuracy of source information presented in the essay, and (3) purpose for the inclusion of source information. We also interviewed EAP students and their instructors to get a better understanding of their perception of students’ challenges in integrating source information appropriately. In Phase 2 of the project, we examined the effectiveness of the pedagogical materials we designed to address the challenges identified in Phase 1. From an instructor perspective, I will discuss the implications of the findings for EAP programs. From an assessor perspective, I will discuss the challenges that integrated writing tasks pose and how they might be addressed.
Heike Neumann
PhD in Second Language Education with a focus on second language assessment
Heike Neumann has a PhD in Second Language Education with a focus on second language assessment from McGill University and is a senior lecturer and head instructor of English as a second language in the Department of Education at Concordia University. As head instructor, she teaches in the for-credit English for academic purposes (EAP) program, coordinates and moderates the development and review process of common midterm and final exams administered to 500 EAP students every year, and leads marking and norming sessions for all exams. Her research focuses on second language writing and second language assessment and has been published in the Journal of Second Language Writing, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Higher Education Research & Development, TESOL Quarterly, Writing & Pedagogy, Canadian Modern Language Review, and TESL Canada Journal. She also co-authored Academic Inquiry 3, a textbook for second language learners in pre-university source-based EAP writing programs published by Oxford University Press.