Prince Edward Island
The Arsenault-Cameron case
*This case was not funded by the LRSP, as the LRSP did not exist at the time it unfolded.
In this case, the Supreme Court had to determine if the right to instruction in the official language of the minority includes the right to an educational institution located in the same area where the number of right-holders reside. The Court also had to determine if the Minister of Education had the authority to approve decisions made by the French-language school board.
The dispute between Ms. Cameron-Arsenault and the government of PEI concerned:
Decision:
According to section 23 of the Charter, the French-language school board has management control. This means that the school board has the obligation to offer instruction in French where the number of right-holders justifies it and to determine the location of the required schools.
Summary of the case
Arsenault‑Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, [2000] 1 SCR 3
In this case, the Supreme Court had to determine whether the right to education in the minority language guaranteed by section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) includes the right to a school located in the region where right-holders live and the number of right-holders justifies the establishment of a school. It also had to determine whether the Minister of Education had the power to approve the decisions of the French School Board, which are described below. In other words, did the School Act and its regulations contravene section 23 of the Charter?
Facts:
A number of parents asked the French School Board to create a French school for grades 1 to 6 in the Summerside area for the 1995-96 school year.
Finding that the number of eligible children met the requirements set out in the School Act Regulations, the Board decided to offer French first-language instruction at Summerside provided that it was approved by the Minister of Education.
The Minister of Education refused to approve the Board’s decision to offer French instruction in Summerside. He proposed instead to maintain transportation services to enable francophone pupils to attend the French school in Abram’s Village. The average bus ride from the Summerside area to the school was 57 minutes.
The parents responded to the government’s refusal to approve the Board’s offer by requesting the Court to declare that they had the right to have their children receive French first-language instruction at the primary level in a school situated in Summerside.
In the first instance, the Prince Edward Island Supreme Court granted their request, but the Appeal Court set aside the judgment and reinstated the Minister’s decision.
Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada:
Applicable principles
The Supreme Court of Canada pointed out that section 23 of the Charter was to be interpreted as a remedial provision in order to guarantee the promotion and preservation of the minority language community (on this, see the history of Prince Edward Island). It stated that section 23 requires the application of substantive equality, which means that official-language minorities must be treated differently, if necessary, taking into account their particular circumstances and needs, in order to provide a standard of education equivalent to that of the official-language majority.
Hence, owing to the variety of circumstances encountered in different schools and the demands of a minority-language education, it was necessary to determine the appropriate educational services for the number of pupils concerned and examine the costs of the contemplated service. Educational services provided to the minority do not have to be identical to those provided to the majority.
Conclusions of the Supreme Court of Canada
The Court stated that a school is the single most important institution for the survival of the official-language minority community, which is itself a true beneficiary under section 23 of the Charter.
The Supreme Court concluded that when a minority-language school board is created, it must respect the minority’s management and control rights and enforce provincial educational standards and directives. Thus, under section 23 of the Charter, the French School Board has the power of management and control. This means that the Board has an obligation to offer French-language instruction where numbers warrant and to determine the location of the required classes or schools.
The Court added that the remedial and protective character of section 23 requires that assessment of whether a school is needed must be based on the potential number of right-holders, and not on the current number of applications for admission. In addition, the Court stated that the decision regarding the construction of a school in Summerside should also take into account the fact that children had to make a choice. The choice was to attend a local school offering instruction in the majority language or to attend a less accessible school offering instruction in the minority language – a choice which would have an impact on the assimilation of minority-language children.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Minister’s decision not to offer educational services in Summerside was unconstitutional. Why? Because the provision of classes or of a school came within the exclusive right of management of the minority, which must be exercised by right-holders represented by the French School Board.
Language rights in PEI
History of language rights in PEI
What is the distinction between the terms “Francophone” and “Acadian”?
Note: the term “Francophone population” includes the Acadian population.
An Acadian is Francophone, but a Francophone is not necessarily an Acadian. The distinction is based on the person’s origins.
According to the 2011 census, which can be consulted on the Statistics Canada website, the number of Francophones living on Prince Edward Island is currently close to 5,000 (according to the definition provided in the Official Language Regulation). The number of Francophones identified is affected by the definition given to the word “Francophone.” For example: is someone who speaks French a Francophone?
What is the history of the Francophone population of PEI?
*All the facts and figures given in the following paragraphs are taken from Statistics Canada.
The history of the Acadian population is marked by turbulent events whose effects are still felt today.
In 1752, 2,000 people made up the Anglophone and German population of Prince Edward Island, and there were 2,663 Francophones in 1753. From September to December 1755, 6,000 Acadians from the Peninsula were deported to the United States.
The expropriation of the Acadians of Prince Edward Island, which took place from 1758 to 1765, reduced the majority Francophone population from 6,500 to about 1,400 persons. The expropriated Francophone population largely moved to the other Maritime Provinces. From about 1771, Acadians began to live more at ease and their numbers increased by approximately 2.5% per year.
Was there ever a policy of assimilation?
According to the L’aménagementlinguistiquedans le monde, in addition to deportation and expropriation, the Francophone population diminished as the result of a policy of assimilation that was adopted during the years following Prince Edward Island’s entry into the Confederation as the seventh province on July 1, 1873. Indeed, shortly after the creation of the province, the provincial government passed a law prohibiting French schools.
What became of the rights of Francophones and Acadians?
Francophones mobilized in response to this policy of assimilation. After complaints and public demands from Francophones, the government agreed to the creation of bilingual schools.
L’Association des instituteursAcadiens de l’Île was created in 1893 for the purpose of encouraging the teaching of French in public schools. La Société Saint-Thomas-d’Aquin (SSTA) was founded in 1919 with the objective of providing services and relevant programs meeting the cultural needs of the Acadian community. Today the SSTA comprises 17 local, regional and provincial associations.
With the adoption of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter) in 1982, and more particularly section 23 of the Charter, Francophones finally obtained a guarantee of their right to education in the minority language. Provincial education law must respect the rights set out in section 23 of the Charter.
Have there been new developments regarding the rights of Francophones and Acadians?
Yes. The French Language Services Act was enacted by the Prince Edward Island government on December 14, 2013. This law and its implementing regulations are designed to guarantee the provision of services and communications in French in connection with provincial services that are officially designated as bilingual. The act enables the public to file complaints when the act is not respected.
Is this a constitutional law?
No, because in order to be constitutional, a law must “be part” of the Canadian Constitution.
Related information
Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island