Haewon Chung a étudié l'informatique et le droit avant de commencer son doctorat en droit à l'Université d'Ottawa. Ses intérêts de recherche comprennent la gestion des connaissances numériques, le libre accès et le droit de la propriété intellectuelle.
Au-delà de sa superviseure, le comité de soutenance de thèse de Haewon Chung était composé des professeurs Chidi Oguamanam , Michael Geist , David Fewer et de la professeure Tina Piper (Université McGill) qui agissait en tant qu’examinatrice externe.
Résumé (en anglais seulement)
The thesis explores possible conflicts between user-driven, socially produced open biotechnology (such as Do-It-Yourself or DIY Bio) and the existing biotechnology patent landscape, and it examines alternative knowledge management strategies for sharing patentable research resources in the newly emerging user-driven R&D environment. This thesis considers whether the biotechnology patent landscape can interfere with, be detrimental to or cause hardships in this alternative open innovation environment and whether knowledge management strategies protect against third party patent interference while ensuring freedom of research and development in this environment. Alternative knowledge management strategies, such as open-source patent licensing, clearinghouses and contract-based compensatory liability regimes, allow DIY biotechnologists to create a protected commons of shared community resources. However, these strategies do not fully address certain problems in patent law, such as fragmented and overlapping rights on cumulative technologies and strategic patent use. Aside from relying on alternative knowledge management, governments can also exercise broad powers to encourage R&D, such as expanding patent law exceptions to reduce patent risks and to stimulate growth and entrepreneurship in user-driven biotechnology.